Talk:International Hat Company/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR   16:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "During World War II, International Hat developed" - World War II already linked in the lead
 * " Among the co-founders of International Harvest Hat was George Tilles, Sr. whose sister Hannah," - comma needed in between "Sr." and "whose"
 * "Founder Pellegrino, this would later prove as the height of the expansion of the company in terms of size, productivity, and financial success." - this bit needs a citation
 * The latte half of the first paragraph in the Products section needs at least a citation. I couldn't find "By the Gulf War, only certain personnel in the US Navy had the pressed fiber sun helmet as serviceable gear" in any source
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No original research found.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Excellent work with this. It is well written, comprehensive, and the sources all check out. The minor concerns shouldn't interfere, so I'll pass this now. JAG UAR   22:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)