Talk:International Inventory of Musical Sources

Move to Répertoire International des Sources Musicales?
Is there a specific reason to have this article under its current title? It seems that there is an article at Répertoire International des Sources Musicales. Obviously this is difficult to find, but it should be the correct title for this entry. (or Repertoire International des Sources Musicales, without the accent aigu.)

I suggest that we

1) move the content of this article to Répertoire International des Sources Musicales

2) redirect to that article from International Inventory of Musical Sources, RISM, and Repertoire International des Sources Musicales.

Does that sound reasonable to you? All the best, Matthias Röder 10:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree -- the merge is a no-brainer. I think that despite WP's rule that English titles are preferable to foreign in general, almost no one calls it IIMS -- it's RISM.  I'll do the merge, and create the redirect from the non-accent version as well.  -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 16:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Keeping the article here would be like insisting that "Tour de France" be moved to "Tour of France". -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 16:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Great! Thanks a lot, Myke! Matthias Röder 17:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)