Talk:International Mobile Equipment Identity/Archive 1

Untitled
Personally, I've tried to investigate the characteristics of FAC and TAC from some data I have access to, and I can't reconcile what is being said about FAC with what really appears to happen. Either the statements made about FAC are wrong, or the FAC hides some interesting secrets about who makes phones and who puts their names on them.

It seems that many manufacturers, especially the major ones (Nokia, Nortel, Motorola, Ericsson/Sony, and Samsung) share FACs. Incidentally, many references state that FAC 30 is for Ericsson, but I could find no Ericsson branded phones of FAC 30 -- only Nokia and Panasonic.

The initial 2 digits of TAC that reportedly indicate the "country of approval" of the phone seem to be the same as E.164 country codes. For example, phones made by Alcatel (a French company) seem to all have TAC starting with 33 (France's calling code). Likewise, Siemens and Bosch have TAC starting with 49 (Germany's calling code). Etc. The wide majority of phones (at least in my data) have TAC starting with 01 (North America). The only irreconcilable oddity is Matsushita, Wavecom, and Handspring, who all have phones with TAC starting with 50. This could refer to any of a number of South American or Caribbean countries (or the Falkland Islands), but all seem unlikely places to develop mobile phones. Motorola has a number of models starting with 44 (Britain). Not surprisingly, 52 (Mexico) is not uncommon. 35 is also common to many manufacturers, and this code probably refers to Finland, though +35 is not a complete calling code.

KeithTyler

IMEI Format
The Final Assembly Code (FAC) was used as part of the IMEI allocation until 01/01/2003. The FAC was used to identify the place of final assembly. The valid range is 00 - 99 and the FAC allocation is unique for each TAC, eg a FAC of "30" for one particular type of GSM phone may indicate a different place of final assembly for another type of phone from the same manufacturer. In practice, a FAC may be consistent for all types of phones from a particular manufacturer, eg "30" may indicate the same place of final assembly for a manufacturer, although this is not a requirement of the GSM Association's allocation procedures.

The first two digits of the TAC are the "Reporting Body Identifier". These digits indicate which organisation issued the IMEI. The GSM Association coordinates the allocation of the first 2 digits to Reporting Bodies. Valid Range 00 – 99.

Since April 2000, the first two digits have been "35" and these indicate that BABT allocated the IMEI. Before April 2000, BABT's identifier was "44"

LesRowland

Remade IMEI table
I remade the IMEI format table, should be clearer but feel free to rip it apart if you can think of a better way to do it - the previous method was pretty illegible. EAi 01:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

imei # repair
I need to rebuild my imei number. I live in the US and when I flash my phone it will erase my imei# stored on the eeprom. my question is it legal in the us to change the imei in order to return it to the original status in the US.


 * Talk with your laywer. --TiagoTiago (talk) 23:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Decimal
The article states:

the first two digits must be decimal (ie less than 0xA0) for it to be an IMEI and not an MEID.

Would not 0x1F be less than 0xA0, and still not decimal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyt0plas (talk • contribs) 04:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, there's an error in the article, but MEIDs almost certainly start at 0xA0. An IMEI must be entirely decimal too (well, we could probably make them hex without breaking anything because they're stored as strings/BCD anyway). The reason, of course, is that it's nice to have contiguous (i.e. easy-to-check) MEIDs, which means simply restricting the first digit (of course, they could've started at 0x9A000000000000, or even 0x9999999999999A). It's all a hack, though: an IMEI/MEID is not a number; it's a decimal/hexadecimal digit string. It's usually represented as a string, or a byte array (MEID)/BCD (IMEI). I might get around to fixing the article. ⇌Elektron 21:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

network and security features enabled by knowing the device used by subscriber?
However, many network and security features are enabled by knowing the current device being used by a subscriber. I don't understand that statement. Please give some sources or remove it. We change our SIM cards arbitrarily between our phones depending on what country we are traveling to, or buy new phones w/o new SIM while abroad, and certainly no security or feature depends on it, nor knows anybody which subscriber bought which device. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.241.15.227 (talk) 17:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

I think they are referring to the fact that the IMEI can be used to help the network provide/limit functionality such as the screen dimensions and codec support for MMS, plus any other Value-Added Services based on the capabilities of the phone. This could be determined using the EIR signalling when the phone is started, or from an embedded SIM Tool Kit application. All without your knowledge... Bwooce (talk) 09:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Is this true?
http://migs.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/know-where-your-nokia-phone-was-made/ I have read similar articles at 2-3 places, and I got an email forward saying the same. I was wondering- is true true, or just a hoax? --RohanDhruva (talk) 08:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Concerned re External Link
Can anyone vouch for the legitimacy of the following link I found on this article?

http://www.rescue15bwp.150m.com/

It links to a very confusing-looking site which, as far as I can see, is hosted by a free web service, yet seems to be suggesting some sort of link to the Punjab police. Can someone confirm it's real please, and not just designed to collect IMEI numbers for some reason? For the moment I've removed it from the links list, feel free to restore it if you have some knowledge of it. - Scelestus (talk) 23:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Using IMEI to prevent mobile theft
This article doesn't address the fact that many large carriers, such as AT&T in the United States, now refuse to blacklist IMEIs without some sort of legal order. The best these carriers do is invalidate SIM cards, which is not a deterrent at all. If preventing mobile theft is one of IMEI's purposes, then this problem should be noted. 71.167.123.86 (talk) 15:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Moon corporation
What on earth is this moon corporation where all imeis are stored?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.226.87.142 (talk) 08:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Ah yes, I hadn't seen that lurking there. I've removed this untrue statement. Bwooce (talk) 05:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Code returned by *#06#
The article states that the IMEI code of most phones can be displayed by *#06#. Three Sony-Ericsson phones I tested returned a code of the format AA-BBBBBB-CCCCCC-D-EE, where AA-BBBBBB-CCCCCC-D appears to be the IMEI code (whether AA-BBBBBB-CCCCCC-EE would be the IMEISV code I don't know). I don't feel at home with this topic but this may be worth mentioning in the text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtg (talk • contribs) 10:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

first link registration required
To use the IMEI-database in the first link, a registration is mandatory. Isn't that against wiki policies to link such a stuff or just damn inconvinient for wiki users?--Baruch ben Alexander - ☠☢☣ 20:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)