Talk:International Socialist Organisation (Australia)

Untitled
we need some information about the size of the organization. Remember readers of wikipedia come from all the world and do not know if ISO counts 25 people or 25 000 people.Johncmullen1960 09:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 19:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Socialist Organisation (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110216201842/http://redsites.alphalink.com.au/marching.rtf to http://redsites.alphalink.com.au/marching.rtf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Socialist Organisation (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706104509/http://www.gouldsbooks.com.au/ozleft/isoleavessa.html to http://www.gouldsbooks.com.au/ozleft/isoleavessa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merger with Solidarity
I propose that the page be merged with Solidarity (Australia). Solidarity according to this page, is just an organisation made after the ISO re-merged with organisations which split from them a few years before. None of these organisations were notable enough to have their own pages. At the current moment, there are two separate pages, one for the organisation before the split, and the organisation after merger with the splits. There doesn't seem to be any evidence that there was any substantial organisational change other than the different name. It would be better to have one quality page that covers the large span of history which can be maintained, rather than two separate ones. Catiline52 (talk) 08:25, 19 March 2020 (UTC)