Talk:International education

could use something on its earlier history
The 19th-century promotion of international education had strong connections with classical liberals who hoped to educate a generation of internationalist "citizens of the world", with international schools like the London International College being funded to a large extent by people such as Richard Cobden and Michel Chevalier, who hoped to promote de-armament, anti-nationalism, and free trade. --Delirium (talk) 05:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Here are some ideas to what can be added
If the introduction were to be worded differently because there are many definitions of what international development can mean, but I think if we were to have sections highlighting what international development means under a certain context, then it could be a better organized article. I also checked citation links to make sure they connect to the same resource and I found that the 2nd citation under the reference tab doesn't connect to an article/information source.S.sherif (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060111204730/http://www.internationaled.org/PDKintro.htm to http://www.internationaled.org/PDKintro.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

This article makes no sense
This article starts by talking about international education being either about student mobility or developing a global competence but then it has a section on the MDGs and EFA, both of which have nothing to do with either student mobility or global competence discussed in the introduction. It continues after that with COIL, which fits within the context of developing global competency. Overall, the article does not discuss much about student mobility, which is probably the main facet of international education. This article is simply a jumbled mess and conflates too many ideas.--2601:1C2:1300:1F33:315B:6F8E:2C39:6450 (talk) 04:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)