Talk:Internationalist Theatre

==Why are edits by veteran Wikipedia editor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philip_Cross being cancelled by @Atlantic306  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306    == If a senior editor like Philip Cross who has the power of rollback, and auto patroller has approved of the copyedit on the Reception of plays by Internationalist Theatre why is @Atlantic306 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306 deleting this? Thank you IPG address — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.104.162.16 (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Now we have another Wikipedia editor who instaed of being constructive and removing the so called `fawning ` bits from press Reception
which is what @Atlantic306  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306 could also have done  , just disregards them as spam too? to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Roscelese since when were reviews from national and international press considered spam? You seem to have some sort of axe to grind? Thank you IPG address ---

What have gay rights got to do with disregarding acknowledged press reviews as spam by by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Roscelese
to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Peaceray gay bashers have no place on this talk page, but neither do editors who disregard some serious input, and do not carry out their remit to edit out the so called `fawning bits` so described by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atlantic306 but approved of by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philip_Cross who has written several article on actors and obviously knows what is genuine press in the theatre world? Please view the material yourself and then do some editing, but restore the ==Reception== section amended by you. Thank you IPG address {213.104.162.106 (talk) 10:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)}