Talk:Internet of Services

yes, merge the page elsewhere as a section

Please do NOT merge as a section -- there is an important concept here that is already being discussed in the EU under this phrase and deserves to stand on its own and many more 62.50.235.190 (talk) 02:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Ted Shelton tshelton@open-first.com

I suppose that the concept "Internet of Services" warrants a page of its own, in comparison to "Internet of Things". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.194.78.161 (talk) 00:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with this topic, but from the IT field. Still, I found the article not easily understandable, i.e. it does not do a good job explaining the IoS to a broad audience. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.3.209.114 (talk) 10:54, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

The main problem is that the term is invented by Germans and rings a little stitled. "Internet der Dienste" sounds fine in German, but "internet of services" is a bit weird. I fear the project may be consigned to insignificance because the progenitors didn't think about what works in English. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.225.121.159 (talk) 16:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

I think this is a very bad idea. They're not the same thing. You'd end up having the IoS as a sub-paragraph of Internet Services and/or Web Services, and I don't think this to be doing the topic's justice.

From my perspective, Internet of Services and TCP/IP are definitely not the same thing. IoS is more closely related to Cloud-Based Computing than TCP/IP. Patrickwooldridge (talk) 22:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)