Talk:Interrogation of militants in the Israel–Hamas war

Soapbox
Given that all this information ultimately comes from the IDF, and given the very pro-Israel slant of this article, this article looks like a WP:SOAPBOX.VR talk 01:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Wonky POV
During the introduction, it is written that "Many news sources, which have analysed the videos, have questioned whether the confessions were extracted under duress.", Except, only AP, Global News (a small Canadian news station, who didn't do it's own investigation) and Amnesty International actually echoed this statement.

- The article doesn't cite any article that supports the claim that "the Associated Press analysed six interrogation videos released by Israel and said the militants may have been speaking under duress". The quoted AP article just says that the prisoners were "speaking quietly but clearly under duress", and the Guardian simply echoes that statement.

- The NBC only said that they might have been under duress.

- The New York Times only echoes the statement of the Gazan Ministry of Health, it had not conducted its own investigation.

Even if those fall under "question", I think the terminology should be changed to "some" rather than "many", which feels to me a loaded word.

BonkeySmoke (talk) 09:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hi, good article. Heavy-duty.

 scope_creep Talk  20:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)