Talk:Interstate 215 (Utah)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Not bad, just a few minor things to fix
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The history section is a bit unclear, especially the second sentence. It may need to be reworded to make it clearer.
 * True. I'll attempt to get to that soon.
 * Meh, I just fixed that sentence that was the most outstanding. I read over it but found no other clarity problems because I'm familiar with the route; what else would need to be fixed in that section? CL — 21:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Better. - Algorerhythms (talk) 00:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * In the route description section, are all the paragraphs referenced from Ref 3? If so, there should probably be a tag at the end of each of the paragraphs to make that clear. Also, Ref 7 might not be considered a reliable source.
 * Ref 3 problem is fixed. As for Ref 7, previous GAs have passed with this source. Perhaps this doesn't change anything, but it's for the record
 * In that case, I'm willing to pass the GA if you can remove the tag on Ref 7. - Algorerhythms (talk) 00:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. CL — 00:54, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold, awaiting changes Algorerhythms (talk) 23:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Passed, after changes made. - Algorerhythms (talk) 01:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold, awaiting changes Algorerhythms (talk) 23:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Passed, after changes made. - Algorerhythms (talk) 01:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate the review. Not everything has been addressed but I'll try to get to it tomorrow or perhaps Wednesday. Thanks again - CL — 03:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)