Talk:Interstate 25 in Colorado/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ---Dough4872 02:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The route description seems very dry and repetitive, I-25 is used in almost every sentence. In addition, there are WP:MOSBOLD violations throughout the prose and many short one-sentence paragraphs.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There are large areas of uncited information throughout the article.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Some more information could be added to the article.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Right now, the article appears to have major issues regarding the prose and sourcing, these issues should be addressed before taking the article GAN. Therefore, I will have to fail the article. The article may be renominated when these issues are taken care of. ---Dough4872 02:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Right now, the article appears to have major issues regarding the prose and sourcing, these issues should be addressed before taking the article GAN. Therefore, I will have to fail the article. The article may be renominated when these issues are taken care of. ---Dough4872 02:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)