Talk:Interstate 35E (Minnesota)/Archive 1

Control section construction history
— Preceding unsigned comment added by NE2 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * CS-1982, Dakota County
 * I-35 to CR 42: 1981
 * CR 42 to CR 11: 1979-81
 * CR 11 to CR 32 (or TH 77?): 1981
 * CR 32 (or TH 77?) to CR 28 (or CR 26?): 1985
 * CR 28 (or CR 26?) to TH 110: 1983-84
 * TH 110 to TH 13: 1966
 * TH 13 to Mississippi River: 1965-66
 * CS-6280, Ramsey County south of I-694 east
 * Mississippi River to TH 5: 1965
 * TH 5 to I-94 west: 1973-92
 * I-94 overlap: 1967
 * I-94 east to Pennsylvania Avenue: 1967
 * Pennsylvania Avenue to Maryland Avenue: 1965
 * Maryland Avenue to I-694 west: 1961
 * I-694 overlap: 1970
 * CS-6281, Ramsey County north of I-694 east
 * I-694 east to CR 96: 1970
 * CS-0282, Anoka County
 * CR 96 to I-35: 1970

Bridge years on the controversial portion
Years in parentheses are from the control section logs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NE2 (talk • contribs) 06:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 9832 Montreal Avenue: 1965 (1965)
 * 9531 TH 5: 1965 (1965)
 * 62872 Bayard Avenue (ped): 1984 (1984; 1973 as 9877)
 * 9528 Randolph Avenue: 1967 (1967)
 * 62863 ramp over Ayd Mill Road: 1971 (1971)
 * 62864 Ayd Mill Road: 1971 (1971)
 * 62865 Jefferson Avenue: 1971 (1971)
 * 9521 Victoria Street: 1966 (1966)
 * 9520 CP Rail: 1966 (1966)
 * 9519 St. Clair Avenue: 1967 (1967)
 * 62802 Grand Avenue: 1985
 * 62803 Ramsey Street: 1985
 * 62804 Walnut Street (ped): 1987
 * 62886 Kellogg Boulevard: 1988
 * 62883 5th Street: 1988
 * 62898 10th Street: 1988
 * 62817 I-94 east: 1989
 * 9805 SB ramp over I-94 west: 1966
 * 62897 St. Peter Street: 1989 (1967 as 9647)
 * 62888 Wabasha Street: 1989 (1967 as 9597)
 * 62889 Cedar Street: 1990 (1967 as 9598)
 * 62891 Minnesota Street: 1990 (1967 as 9681)
 * 62894 Robert Street: 1989 (1967 as 9649)
 * 62893 Jackson Street: 1990 (1967 as 9650)
 * 62874 NB ramp over I-94 east: 1989
 * 62884 SB ramp over I-94 ramp: 1990
 * 62858 I-94 west NB: 1989 (1967 as 9808)
 * 62857 I-94 west SB: 1990 (1967 as 9807)
 * 62701 SB ramp over I-94 west: 1989
 * 62810 University Avenue NB: 1989 (1967 as 9656)
 * 9655 University Avenue SB: 1963 (1967)
 * 9265 Pennsylvania Avenue: 1964 (1965)

Neologism
Do you have a reliable source for the term commons? —Scott5114↗ 10:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * It's the standard term used by Mn/DOT for freeway overlaps. specifically applies the term to the I-35E/I-94 interchange: "St. Paul 35E/94 commons - 260,000". So do  and  ("the rebuilding of the I-35E/I-94 commons area in St. Paul").  includes an article from the Star Tribune that defines it as "2 freeways share a single right-of-way". --NE2 11:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Passed Good Article nomination!
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Well-written article with appropriate citations. The only problem I have is the picture up at the top of the article - I think that could be moved down into the "Route description section".  N F 24 (radio me!Editor review) 23:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

USRD GA audit
This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Looking through the article, there are some issues that should be resolved for this article to retain GA status, or be promoted in the future:
 * There are a number of hidden comments in the article that contain questions that should be answered, if possible.
 * The lead needs to be expanded to summarize the history per WP:LEAD.
 * Most of the online citations lack access dates.
 * The AADT information should be updated; I would assume that Mn/DOT has published data more recent than six years ago.
 * One of the citations has a dead link.
 * I did clean up the references by putting them all in templates. This way, newspapers are italicized, everything is pretty much consistently formatted and the author names are in the standard "Last, First" order or "Staff" is listed for corporate works. I'm concerned that without some additional work though, this article could be sent to GAR yet.  Imzadi 1979  →   06:47, 19 January 2012 (UTC)