Talk:Interstate 37/GA

GA review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Good job! &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 20:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)


 * One question - why aren't there mileposts for I-37? The road seems pretty much fixed in place. Are mileposts just not available? &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 23:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * They are the same as the exit numbers, so it would be redundant. --Holderca1talk 23:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)