Talk:Interstate 376/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Dough 48  72  01:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 Currently, the article has several issues before it can be considered for GA. Therefore, I will have to fail it. The article may be renominated once the issues are addressed.  Dough 48  72  01:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The lead of the article is too long, it should be an adequate summary of the route. The history is a mess, with poor section organization and bulleted lists.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There are several statements and whole sections that are unreferenced. In addition "www.pahighways.com" is not a reliable source.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The route description lacks detail for a route of its length
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: