Talk:Interstate 470 (Missouri)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Imzadi 1979  →   22:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

DABs and ELs are good.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Watch that some things (BYP US 71) are abbreviated without being spelled out, but other wise the prose is fine.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I'm planning on editing the svg for the map tonight for you. The background shouldn't be transparent, which makes it look funny in the infobox
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Things look fine. I'd suggest you sweep through to double check abbreviation usage though.  Imzadi 1979  →   00:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm planning on editing the svg for the map tonight for you. The background shouldn't be transparent, which makes it look funny in the infobox
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Things look fine. I'd suggest you sweep through to double check abbreviation usage though.  Imzadi 1979  →   00:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)