Talk:Interstate 476/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I have made some improvements to the article including expanding the lead and rewriting the route description a bit. Dough4872 (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks good, what happened to the control cities? I think its been improved enough, thanks to User:Dough4872 and User:Spikebrennan. I'm impressed. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  03:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I have made some improvements to the article including expanding the lead and rewriting the route description a bit. Dough4872 (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks good, what happened to the control cities? I think its been improved enough, thanks to User:Dough4872 and User:Spikebrennan. I'm impressed. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  03:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I have made some improvements to the article including expanding the lead and rewriting the route description a bit. Dough4872 (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks good, what happened to the control cities? I think its been improved enough, thanks to User:Dough4872 and User:Spikebrennan. I'm impressed. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  03:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks good, what happened to the control cities? I think its been improved enough, thanks to User:Dough4872 and User:Spikebrennan. I'm impressed. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  03:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)