Talk:Interstate 5 in Washington/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mccunicano (talk · contribs) 07:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this article soon. ⑉⑉ Mccunicano ☕️  07:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Overall the article seems ready to pass, though there are a few concerns I have noted below.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * A citation tag is present in the article in regards to the date of completion of a six-laning project along the interstate in Olympia, but that one tag shouldn't be enough to keep this from passing.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Good work expanding the scope of the article to be less focused on Seattle as was a chief concern in the article's last GA nomination.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * See my comment below about the position of an image
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Great work so far on this article, sorry for the wait. I have a few concerns before I pass this article. The left-aligned image under the "Skagit and Whatcom counties" subsection would be better off being aligned to the right since it's at the start of a subsection. Under "Suburban and rural construction", B.C. should be written out as British Columbia since its the only instance in the prose where its abbreviated. I also think it would be important to mention what happened to the fallout shelter in Ravenna that is mentioned in the "Seattle planning and construction section". ⑉⑉ Mccunicano  ☕️  06:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Fixed the image alignment and BC abbreviation, added details on the fallout shelter, and temporarily removed the uncited information until I can find a suitable source (still waiting on some information from the state archives). Thanks for reviewing.  Sounder Bruce  20:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking addressing those minor concerns and for making those additional spacing fixes. This article has passed. Keep up the good work.  ⑉⑉ Mccunicano  ☕️  06:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Great work so far on this article, sorry for the wait. I have a few concerns before I pass this article. The left-aligned image under the "Skagit and Whatcom counties" subsection would be better off being aligned to the right since it's at the start of a subsection. Under "Suburban and rural construction", B.C. should be written out as British Columbia since its the only instance in the prose where its abbreviated. I also think it would be important to mention what happened to the fallout shelter in Ravenna that is mentioned in the "Seattle planning and construction section". ⑉⑉ Mccunicano  ☕️  06:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Fixed the image alignment and BC abbreviation, added details on the fallout shelter, and temporarily removed the uncited information until I can find a suitable source (still waiting on some information from the state archives). Thanks for reviewing.  Sounder Bruce  20:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking addressing those minor concerns and for making those additional spacing fixes. This article has passed. Keep up the good work.  ⑉⑉ Mccunicano  ☕️  06:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)