Talk:Interstate 605 (Washington)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rschen7754 21:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Prose review
 * Lead - Proposals have been around since the 1960
 * --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The Washington State Department of Transportation has no projects designated I-605, however a project converting Washington State Route 18 to a full limited-access freeway is nearing completion, which is south and east of both I-5 and I-405. - run-on
 * --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Proposals - Some of the first plans for a new interstate freeway, bypassing I-405 surfaced in 1968, - the commas make this really hard to read. Try adding one after I-405.
 * --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Same sentence - another run-on
 * --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Better, but there's still a run-on. -Rschen7754 00:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Now? --Admrboltz (talk) 00:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Next sentence - another run-on
 * --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This isn't the WA-18 article, I don't see the need for the infobox.
 * --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

On hold - should be quick fixes, and then a pass. --Rschen7754 22:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Passing article. --Rschen7754 01:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)