Talk:Interstate 680 (California)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Well-written.
 * Lead section
 * Add "its southernmost point" between "...begins" and "at...".
 * Route description section
 * In the last sentence of the least paragraph, spell out California General Assembly in the Assembly Concurrent Resolution 104, chapter 168.
 * For the last sentence of the second paragraph, be more specific in mentioning "takeover robbery"? Is that a carjacking?
 * In the final paragraph's fourth sentence, check spelling of Carquinez Strait. It may be misspelled.
 * History section
 * Create articles or redirects if needed for US101E, Martinez-Benica Ferry, California Route 74, and urgency measure.
 * In the lead sentence of the fourth paragraph, put "(Federal Highway Administration after 1967)" after The Bureau of Public Roads.
 * Future section
 * How long has the proposal to add a high-occupancy toll been under consideration? Please specify.


 * Factually accurate and verifiable.
 * References missing on the first five paragraphs in the Route descrption section.
 * No references listed in the Future section.
 * For references listed, use WP:CITET to get formats standardized.
 * Reference 10: Create article for California Highways and Public Works.
 * Reference 15: Create article for urgency measure.
 * Reference 16: Create and italicize San Mateo Times.
 * References 20 and 22: Italicize Oakland Tribune.
 * Reference 29: Shown as "Forbidden" when checked out. Find alternative reference.
 * External link: The link has been moved. Please show.


 * Neutral.
 * No issues.


 * Stable.
 * Last edit was yesterday. Prior to that, it was on 5 May 2010.


 * Images.
 * All images are valid.
 * For images taken in the Route description section and the first one in the History section, list when the images were take in the caption.


 * Overall
 * Hold. Needs works, but can be done for GA.

Reviewer: Chris (talk) 13:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe the red links do not need to be created for it to be GA. Also, for the stability section, what do you mean? -- P C  B   20:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It was when the last set of edits took place. This was for point of reference on stability. Sorry about the misunderstanding. Chris (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good so far. Do not forget to put dates the images were taken as mentioned in the images section review. Chris (talk) 15:04, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Passed GA. Chris (talk) 15:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)