Talk:Interstate 73 in North Carolina

Merge
I don't think I-73 will ever be finished. All info is already in parent article, as such I think we should merge as I-73 is only Start class although this is only C class. --Hurricane Tracker 495 20:51, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose—I'd just leave it as in since there are other state-level subarticles for other states, thus it's not all here.  Imzadi 1979   →   21:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I-73 is planned to pass through multiple states and has multiple state-detail articles for the existing/planned segments in North Carolina and the planned segments in other states. Therefore, it would be too much to merge into one article.  Dough   4872   22:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment please don't use the I-73 will pass thru other states reason as it likely won't be built. --Hurricane Tracker 495 22:44, 25 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Support without prejudice to re-splitting in the future. I would rather we maintain one page now and then split out S-D articles in the distant future. –Fredddie™ 22:48, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * As a procedural note, the initiator of this discussion has been blocked as a sockpuppet. But regardless I would say oppose because not only do these subarticles exist, but they already have a significant amount of text. --Rschen7754 07:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Not sure if we are still discussing this, I just came across it. I get the argument, however, I do think it's more likely than not that South Carolina will build its section and I do think Virginia may eventually complete the Interstate to Roanoke. So I think a state article in NC, SC, and VA at least is warranted. I also feel like keeping the NC section in the main article is quite broad when officially the highway will run from Myrtle Beach to Michigan and there is no certainty that the highway will never be built. That is just my preference I guess.--Ncchild (talk) 01:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)