Talk:Interstate 805/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Dough 48  72  00:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The route description contains several consecutive sentences that begin with "It then continues" or "It then meets".
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Most of the history needs to be referenced.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The route description and history could use some more details. The history appears to be missing some information.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * From looking at the article, although fairly decent, it appears to need more information and more references in order for it to be considered a GA. Therefore, I will have to fail it for now. Once more references and information can be added, the article can be renominated.  Dough 48  72  00:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * From looking at the article, although fairly decent, it appears to need more information and more references in order for it to be considered a GA. Therefore, I will have to fail it for now. Once more references and information can be added, the article can be renominated.  Dough 48  72  00:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)