Talk:Interstate 85 in North Carolina

Began the talk page. Any and all comments and questions are welcomed. --Bdj95 04:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, no. Only those regarding the page are. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 19:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

NC state highway shields
NC state highway shields are all square, no matter the number, so routes with 3 digits are still 20px... just so you know for future reference. --Triadian 03:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Exit 68
The northbound and southbound parts are separate. Northbound, it's linked to NC 152, while southboumd, it's linked to US 29 via an unsigned connector. I added this, but it was deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.86.240.209 (talk) 21:55, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * There are several locations along I-85 like that, it's not unique. Northbound/Southbound ramps are typically noted if they are incomplete in some way like no return ramp and such.  Since both sides of I-85 are signed the same, its not worth mentioning.  If others want to weigh in on this, I'm willing to listen and consider otherwise.  --WashuOtaku (talk) 22:26, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

There is no direct return to I-85 from the NC 152 northbound exit. Northbound motorists exiting at Exit 68 onto NC 152 desiring to re-enter northbound I-85 must utilize the unsigned connector, and vice-versa for southbound motorists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.86.240.92 (talk) 00:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Interstate 85 in North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070203052023/http://www.ncdot.org/public/50thanniv/ncinterstates/download/factsI85.pdf to http://www.ncdot.org/public/50thanniv/ncinterstates/download/factsI85.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Interstate 85 in North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111025123251/http://charlotte.news14.com/content/sports/auto_racing/648280/mecklenburg-county-commissioners-approve--jeff-gordon-expressway- to http://charlotte.news14.com/content/sports/auto_racing/648280/mecklenburg-county-commissioners-approve--jeff-gordon-expressway-
 * Added tag to http://www.sunherald.com/2012/05/24/3970042/ready-for-the-jeff-gordon-expressway.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120601193224/http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/02/03/2983541/new-interchange-planned-for-bottlenecked.html to http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/02/03/2983541/new-interchange-planned-for-bottlenecked.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715233955/http://www.salisburypost.com/News/040910-bridge-wilcox-bridge-at-river-closed to http://www.salisburypost.com/News/040910-bridge-wilcox-bridge-at-river-closed

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Gallery split
Is anybody making any effort to split the commons category by county, and/or by city? -User:DanTD (talk) 18:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article?
Do you all think that this article is ready to become a good article? At first, it didn't seem like a good article, but then I realized that the route description was way too short. So I went ahead and rewrote it by hand, and added inline citations to the paragraphs that didn't have them before. After that, I nominated it, because the entire article is fully detailed, all citations are inline, and it doesn't go into unnecessary detail. Let me know if you guys have any questions. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 23:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)