Talk:Interstate 94 in Montana

What is this about ranch access?
In the section about Treasure, Rosebud and Custer Counties, I am seeing something (mile marker 63.01) about ranch access. Could this possibly be a grade-level intersection? I have read that this situation arises in very remote areas (most notably I-10 in western Texas), where the costs do not justify building an INTERCHANGE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.52.3 (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Here's a picture of a sign for one Same idea as those in Texas, but they are grade separated interchanges. –Fredddie™ 03:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

River crossings
River crossings... You ought to explain where (by milepost) there are any crossings of major rivers, such as the Missouri River or the Yellowstone River.47.215.183.159 (talk) 11:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

249 or 219?
The miles on I-94 should be 249, mile markers go up to 250, highest exit number is 248, and net miles say 248 miles or something, so I don't get why that says 219. DENBRO1995 (talk) 23:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The 219.38 figure is from the FHWA source. You need to find an appropriate reliable source for your claim, because mileposts may not always reflect actual mileage due to realignments or other discrepancies. I've replaced it with a state log, but simply changing two digits without finding a source is not an appropriate way to fix an error.  Sounder Bruce  23:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)