Talk:Interstate 95 in Pennsylvania/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * I would bring this to WT:USRD and WT:PASH to see if someone is interested in fixing this. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * They have been notified, I will also notify major contributors. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  00:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have made changes to the article as requested. Dough4872 (talk) 03:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Article has been improved and kept as a Good Article. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  14:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)