Talk:Interstitial cell of Cajal

Untitled
Just wondering what "ventricle" is being talked about in the article. Tristanb 08:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Surely this is classified wrongly! ICCs are in the Gut, not the brain Camsbridge 11:36, 3 June 2010 BST

Merger proposal
There is a separate wikipage on telocytes, which are the exact same cell type. I propose that that page be merged into this one. Skingski (talk) 18:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose on the grounds that equivalence is contested. My view is that it is better to keep the pages separate for now, but to link them better, unless there is a very clear review article that states that there is a consensus on their equivalence. Klbrain (talk) 22:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose until Telocyte becomes an accepted overarching term. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:15, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 15 June 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 21:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) – There are more than one kind; always referred to in the plural; Latin plural used in infobox. Iztwoz (talk) 15:43, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. You could say the same for many of the cells mentioned in list of distinct cell types in the adult human body, but the singular is used per WP:PLURAL. Vpab15 (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you wish to have this discussed at a formal RM? Sam Sailor 17:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * No thanks at the moment Sam but perhaps in the future some MOS change might acknowledge all the varied long-accepted plural usages, and accept their expansion.--Iztwoz (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)