Talk:Invalid species and varieties of Pachypodium

There is information in this article that is not, and will not be, included in the article I redirected it to. That makes me a little wary of going through with the action, but I ultimately decided to redirect, since I feel that this article is too specific for an encyclopedia, not to mention the somewhat unusual nature of the information gathering process. From what I can tell, the fellow who wrote all these Pachypodium articles went through about a half dozen sources from various time periods in the course of his research; these were the names that he found in the early sources that had been deprecated in later sources. Besides the overreliance on the Rapanarivo book (which seems to be a problem with all the articles) the whole thing is sort of vaguely original research. So I've redirected it. I doubt anyone will care (this is pretty quiet corner of the 'pedia), but if you do, there's my reasoning. If you disagree, by all means revert me, but for the life of me I can't see what else to do with this one. --RobthTalk 03:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)