Talk:Investment certificate

Reads like a marketing pitch. Lacking context/history.
Good to be unbiased! But omits crucial context. Will be tricky to add history without POV but worth the effort.

This investment class has a storied history. But none of the story is here save one 100 year old example. It's important not to pitch investment firms. But it's impossible to explain the risks and rewards and risks of this investment class without at least referencing a lot of assets in this category. People get defrauded all the time when they don't understand how serious it is not to be insured, or how they are depending on the solvancy of the ïnvestment sales organization. This will help lead people to invest in Ponzi schemes frequently masked this way. CharlesPrice1964 (talk) 01:51, 25 March 2023 (UTC)