Talk:Investors in People

A logo for this would be great.

When did investors in people start?

Merge Investors in people With Investors in People
Makes sense to merge the articles. They both refer to the same organization. Grif280 (talk) 21:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Stongly agree there is no need for two the only difference is in the lower case PJMcD 12:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC) ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ cons

Fair use rationale for Image:Iiplogo.png
Image:Iiplogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

why is there swearing above?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.40.123.105 (talk) 12:42, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Quite a vague article
It mentions an "Investors in People framework" but doesn't even outline what that is. The article doesn't give a very clear idea of what this organisation does or why it is useful. Equinox (talk) 12:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Adding to the page
For a company that has been around for over 25 years and was reported to have over one third of the UK workforce working for recognised Investors in People companies, there really isn't a lot of information on this page. I have added examples of historic and current research and some insight into the numbers of organisations that have been recognised over the years. I will look to see if there are any more current figures than 2002(!), but this still gives a base for comparison. I'll return with more when (and if) I am able to find any more decent references. LastOneHome (talk) 13:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)