Talk:Invincible-class battlecruiser/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk) 11:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * "although it must be said that the" - remove "it must be said that as it is redundant.
 * Double check the use of HMS and SMS as it is currently inconsistently used. Also make sure that all ship names are properly italicised.
 * There is a problematic convert template in the Battle of Jutland section.
 * Link Admiral Horace Hood in the Jutland section.
 * Put the last paragraph of Jutland into a sub-section of its own as it deals with the last five years of the battlecruiser's careers, not the battle itself.


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * "Gardiner and Gray" - I'd rather you named the publication, although it is not essential.


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Is it recorded how many casualties were casued by Inflexible ' s mine explosion?


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. I had a few other comments, but lost electricity at a vital moment and couldn't remember all that I had written. However, none of them was too important. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 11:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)