Talk:IoSafe

ioSafe Talk Page
Hard drive technology continues to evolve in many ways, providing the end user with more reliable devices to backup, store and recover data from. Over the years hard drives have increased in capacity, developed faster read/write speeds and offer more features and connectivity than ever before.
 * 1) Hard Drive Technology:

ioSafe hard drives offer additional characteristics to standard hard drives by incorporating shock resistance, fire resistance and water resistance.
 * 1) ioSafe Role in Hard Drive Technology:

Additional resources have been cited (press releases, independent research, etc). To further improve this article, please contribute additional reviews and benchmark tests from reliable and objective resources. Clear references will always improve the article and accuracy of the information.
 * 1) Improving the Article:

Additional testing procedures to verify the importance of fire resistance and water resistance as it relates to hard drives and data storage will be helpful. Comparing facts from different sources and verification of said sources is encouraged.
 * 1) Facts, Fire Ratings, etc:

The ioSafe talk page will be used to store material from the article which has been removed because it is not verified, so that time can be given for references to be found. New material can sometimes be prepared on the talk page until it is ready to be put into the article.
 * 1) Sharing Materials:

The ioSafe hard drive talk page is particularly useful to discuss edits. If one of your edits has been reverted, and you change it back again, it is good practice to leave an explanation on the talk page and a note in the edit summary that you have done so.
 * 1) Discussion of Edits:

The goal of the talk section is to continually improve the information available on the subject of fire and water protected hard drives, network attached storage and backup devices. - Harddrives (talk) 15:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Well I agree with some of your statements above. However, I feel this article is already too long considering its relatively small market share.  There also needs to be more of a two-sided argument.  Adding a "criticism" section (like we see in the Microsoft article), or a "legal cases" section (like we see in the SentrySafe article) would be a good start.  Listing the failures of the company and the faults of the products are what an encyclopedic article would possibly include.  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 16:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the input. I will certainly add additional sections to the article as more information becomes available. At this time I will investigate into "legal cases" cited against the company and add them accordingly. Would it be appropriate to add in the additional note/citation for the press release of the most recent product called ioSafe Solo? - Harddrives (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Cristicims
New section on criticisms of hard drive backup devices has been added. - Harddrives (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Can we remove the flags?
I worked on this page to update some of the information with references and remove language that seemed like an advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faradorian (talk • contribs) 23:09, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello. No. At least not as long as the article includes an uncited product catalogue and an uncited list of "firsts". Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 03:09, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I've removed all of the "firsts" and product catalogue elements I could find. Faradorian (talk) 23:00, 31 July 2018 (UTC)