Talk:Ioan C. Filitti/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 09:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * References

Surname before first name in all sources all that's needed here.♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅. ⇒ T A  P  15:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

And the inline citations names too.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * The infobox image is arguably public domain now.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:40, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Easily meets GA criteria and with a bit of work has FA potential. It could do with a few more images though..♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:35, 14 June 2012 (UTC)