Talk:Ion G. Duca

Facts deleted
Someone is deleting facts that I added. I have read a lot of books about Romanian politicians and it is a fact that this man was murderd as a form of revenge act by Iron Guard fascists. I think a fascist is trying to defend it or something by shortening down facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.248.90.243 (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Do see WP:NPOV, WP:WEASEL and WP:PEACOCK. Thank you. Dahn (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ion G. Duca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110101231845/http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/7532 to http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/7532

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Last sentence
"His son, George, edited Duca and George's memoirs while at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in the 1970s and 1980s." This isn't clear, at least, not to me. The relevant fact for this article would be that the son edited the father's memoirs (which were already mentioned in the previous sentence). If the writer intended to add that the son also edited his own memoirs, it didn't fit well into the sentence and isn't relevant to this article, which is about the father. So I'd write "His son, George, edited these memoirs while at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in the 1970s and 1980s." Would that be correct and clear? Andrew Dalby 19:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC)