Talk:Ionic compound/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 18:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm starting a Good Article review of this article
I'm starting a Good Article review of this article.  North8000  (talk) 18:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I always like to ask this early, is there someone here who would be involved on behalf of the article? Sincerely,  North8000  (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * yes, I'm around as nominator. Thanks for reviewing. --99of9 (talk) 22:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Cool!  North8000  (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Well-written

 * Passes this criteria. What an excellent job!  Does far better at informing the reader than a typical Wikipedia article on a technical topic. The sentences are written so that they natively make clear informative statements, and without having to research the internal links.  North8000  (talk) 11:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Factually accurate and verifiable

 * Meets this criteria  North8000  (talk) 11:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Broad in its coverage

 * Meets this criteria.  North8000  (talk) 11:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

 * Meets this criteria  North8000  (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

 * Passes this criteria.  North8000  (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Illustrated, if possible, by images

 * Has 9 images, all either are in public domain or have suitable licenses.  North8000  (talk) 15:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Passes this criteria. Images are well-chosen to enhance the coverage of the topic.  North8000  (talk) 11:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Discussion
Couple of spelling tweaks? I think that the article is in US English but includes "polarised" and "neutralise". I would have changed but wasn't sure.  North8000  (talk) 11:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations, this article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article.
Congratulations, this article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article. Compared to an typical Wikipedia article on a technical topic, this is very well written and does a better job at explaining a technical topic. Excellent work!  North8000  (talk) 11:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)