Talk:Iowa Highway 150/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 02:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

DABs and ELs are good. (The link checker is choking on some links, but manual checks confirm that they are ok.)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I found a word missing and added it. Everything else looked good.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All good here
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * All good here
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * All good here
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All good there.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * With the single fix, I found nothing that stuck out as an issue in need of correction to list this article, ergo, it's being promoted to GA status.  Imzadi 1979  →   04:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * With the single fix, I found nothing that stuck out as an issue in need of correction to list this article, ergo, it's being promoted to GA status.  Imzadi 1979  →   04:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)