Talk:Ip Man (film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I'll be doing a review for this film shortly. It's playing at my local theater and after I go see it, i'll continue with the review. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I've started reviewing the article. The prose is generally strong so far but I have some questions regarding sources. wu-jing.org seems to be a fan site. Can you find proof of this website being a reliable source? Same for kungfucinema.com. Cite 21b does not mention what it claims to be citing. Cites 47, 48 and 49 need accessdates at least. Cites to http://www.ipman-movie.com/blog/?cat=5 seem to be broken.

I'll go forth with the review more thoroughly after the wu-jing.com as a resource is ok'd. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

It's 04 September now, over a month since the review began. Maybe someone else should review this, getting it out the way. RAIN..the..ONE  HOTLINE 14:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

To offer an opinion on the source, the website wu-jing.org calls itself a "fansite dedicated to wu jing and martial arts films" which does not sounds like it's reliable. Ergo, unless sourcing can be fixed soon, the article should be failed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 00:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to agree. There has not been any way new updates to this that I've seen to undo the wu jing cites, so I don't know if I can mark this further. If it's not updated at all to fix this by Friday, I'm going to fail this article for now. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Nothing's been changed, at all. Shouldn't it be removed now? RAIN..the..ONE  HOTLINE 21:37, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, at this point nothing's going to change, so I'm failing the article. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 04:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)