Talk:Ireland King of Arms/GA1

GA Reassessment
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Ireland King of Arms/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.


 * The lead needs to be expanded to adequately summarise the article.


 * There are too many redlinks in this rather short article. Either stubs need to be written, or the links removed.


 * Important statements are uncited, such as the majority of Impact and legacy, and the last halves of the final two paragraphs in Origins of the office.


 * The article needs to explain the function of the office.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:07, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I think I've addressed these concerns. Dr pda (talk) 07:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Everything looks fine to me now, so I've closed this review. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 14:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)