Talk:Irmgard Möller

Fair use rationale for Image:Mugmoeller.gif
Image:Mugmoeller.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Biased?
The phrase It is now proven beyond reasonable doubt and accepted by nearly all independent observers that these deaths were indeed suicides. seems strongly biased. It should either be sourced and reworded, or deleted. Nazgul02 (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Sources: simply every serious book on the RAF, every non-RAF-fanzine site. It is simply true. In Germany (outside the most hard core RAFfanbase) it is simply on a line with The Reichstag was not burned down by the Nazis. Elvis is dead. There are no Ufos.--Radh (talk) 21:39, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

P. S.: Möller simply l i e s, I do not know why this should be such an outlandish idea
 * What is outlandish is the notion that your comments could be taken seriously. You refer to 'RAF-fanzine' sites revealing your own stance on these issues. You state, 'It is simply true' and, 'Möller simply lies' as though your belief is a religious act of faith which doesn't require evidence in support. The article is heavily biased - though I am not surprised that you are unable to see that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.187.233.172 (talk) 09:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Revert
I have just reverted a statement, that it was impossible to bring weapons into a high security prison like Stammheim. Please do not add fancy ideas or wild guesses here.--Radh (talk) 16:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

She was stabbed
She says there was no suicide pact, and that the State murdered everybody. Ok, what exactly does she say happened to her? She says she did not stab herself, has she ever said who did? The article needs to clarify this point. 77.69.34.203 (talk) 10:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irmgard Möller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130531035827/http://www.germanguerilla.com/red-army-faction/pdf/92_05_18_moeller.pdf to http://www.germanguerilla.com/red-army-faction/pdf/92_05_18_moeller.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)