Talk:Iron Maiden/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 19:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The band are currently undergoing a resurgence in popularity, with their latest studio offering, The Final Frontier, peaking at No. 1 in 28 different countries[1] and receiving widespread critical acclaim. This needs a date, "currently" ia word to avoid, suggest as of [whatever year].
 * A bad performance at the Bridgehouse Where is the Bridgehouse?
 * was considered to join the group at one time suggest something like "was considered as a potential group member"
 * Bandwagon Heavy Metal Soundhouse Where was this?
 * What happened to the fourth song from the demo?
 * particularly through alleged drug usage, which Di'Anno himself admits. If he admits it, why is it alleged?
 * In a press release regarding From Fear to Eternity, band manager Rod Smallwood revealed that the band will release a new concert video to DVD in 2011, needs an update as it is now almost 2012
 * Overall good prose, just few tweaks needed. I made a number of minor copy-edits.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Well cited, I assume good faith for off-line sources, spotchecks confirm the cited statements, consistency in retrieval dates would be good, dd-mm-yyyy is best, I think. Sources appear to be RS, no OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough coverage
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No edit warring
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * File:Wordmarks of IM.jpg has the wrong licence, should have the logo license or PD-textlogo Otherwise images check out fine.
 * Sound samples check OK, with suitable captions, duration and rationales.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, nearly there, just a few issues to address. On hold until 2 January. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the fixes, happy to list, Jezhotwells (talk) 12:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I have edited the article according to each of the above suggestions. Although I trust that these issues are now rectified, I am willing to make further alterations if necessary.--Nerdtrap (talk) 01:09, 24 December 2011 (UTC)