Talk:Irrational exuberance

Sourcing needed
The paragraph on Fedspeak and Greenspeak, while well written, isn't exactly encyclopedic in tone, and veers dangerously close to opinion. We need to source it. I'll look at the sources from those two articles to see what we can use. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Seeming Contraction
Another issue I see with the article is that one section says that Greenspan's comments had an impact in that three years later, the averages were way down, yet in another section it says that in spite of Greenspan's comments, three years later stock valuations were way up. The article can't be making both claims at the same time without explanation. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC)