Talk:Isaac Komnenos (son of Alexios I)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: KAVEBEAR (talk · contribs) 03:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Changed the infobox to infobox royalty like the other Byzantine imperial family articles. Infobox nobility is rarely used. He is the son of an emperor.
 * "During the struggle for John's succession in 1143, he supported the unsuccessful candidacy of his nephew, likewise named Isaac, over the younger Manuel I Komnenos." - younger what? It isn't explicit that they were both his nephews.
 * "He was the brother of Emperor John II Komnenos and the historian Anna Komnene. Isaac was given the dignity of Caesar by his father." - Please expand. Anything you stated in the introduction must be repeated in the body. So let's mention his parents. It also looks like he was a porphyrogennetos, no? Explain that too not just link.
 * "Isaac was also a scholar and patron of learning" - Also??? So Isaac was engaged in warfare and also a scholar and patron of learning. If not, then the also needs to be removed.
 * "after an alleged conspiracy" - Is there any detail about this conspiracy?
 * "to usurp the imperial throne from him" - Is there any detail this?
 * "Isaac is also depicted in the Chora Church in Constantinople, which he extensively rebuilt." --- Depicted in what form? It seems to be a mosaic. Any studies done on this piece of art?
 * Any detail on when he died or was the founding of the monastery his last known action?
 * Anymore detail about his wife Irene?
 * "John Arbantenos" - Who is he?
 * "Andronikos I Komnenos, emperor 1183–1185." - His son became emperor! I think this is important to mention in his father's article. Also include this in the introduction as well.

Hi Iazyges and KAVEBEAR, again, as one of the the main authors of this article, I ask that this nomination either a) be withdrawn or b) put on hold for some time (at least two weeks), because the article is incomplete; I have not had the time to incorporate the main biographical source, Varzos, into it yet. Constantine  ✍  12:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Placing this on hold. Please let me know when you are ready to move on.KAVEBEAR (talk) 14:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I can still wait but just checking in case you've forgotten. KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:15, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Major rewriting has been completed, the things that should be in the article are there (and have also answered many of the points you raised in the review, I just noticed). I am still tweaking around, and looking if there are any other major sources I have missed. Should be done and review-ready by next week. Cheers, Constantine  ✍  07:52, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I have finished going over the article one last time. I don't think there's anything major left to add, and I am quite happy with structure, etc. Go ahead :) Constantine  ✍  14:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I need to read these once more before passing. Are you sure this is it. You said it will ready by next week initially. Don't rush perfection.KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the compliment, but I think that's it. I considered adding some more info on the works and buildings he wrote/commissioned/founded, but this is not the right place. There are some interesting discussions in Linardou and some others on him, but these are topics that are niche scholarly conjecture at best, not really suited for an encyclopedia article; it would overwhelm the casual reader. I am quite happy with the article as it is, otherwise I wouldn't suggest reviewing it. Likewise take your time with it, and be as nitpicky as you want ;) Cheers, Constantine  ✍  19:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

"John Komnenos (born c. 1112),..." - Please mention his marriage to the daughter of Leo I, Prince of Armenia. That is all.KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:30, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I had missed that. Cheers, Constantine  ✍  07:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)