Talk:Isaac Wunder order

Initial version
This is the first version of my first attempt at an article. The main motivation for creating was the two existing references to Isaac Wunder in the article on vexatious litigation, which I think would benefit from an article about the order named after him; after all, the name is hardly intuitive!

Note that the article uses a template in my user space,. It is a modified version of which adds "presiding=" to accommodate one of the citations in the article. I'm a little hazy on the procedure for suggesting a modification of a high-use template like. It would certainly get a better name. If this is a problem, I can convert it to use the standard template, at the cost of a small amount of information in a footnote.

Rhsimard (talk) 09:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * You can suggest changes at Template talk:Cite court. – ukexpat (talk) 02:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Custom template citation commented out.
The citation using my custom template (which breaks its relevance to Case citation) is commented out. The information in it can be found in the item referred to in the first reference anyway; I originally though it would be nice to include it in the references directly.

21:45, 17 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhsimard (talk • contribs)

Updates
Several items already linked in the body of the article have been removed from the See also list. I left in frivolous litigation, vexatious litigation and frivolous or vexatious in part to juxtapose the generic terms (i.e., "frivolous" and "vexatious" as ordinary adjectives) with the term "frivolous or vexatious" which has a formal definition in some jurisdictions, including Ireland. Rhsimard (talk) 22:25, 27 June 2011 (UTC)