Talk:Isidore Cohen

Failed "good article" nomination
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of, , compares against the  six good article criteria:


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * 2) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

I felt this article is too short for GA right now - it does not contain enough content, and does not have deep enough coverage of the subject. This also means it doesn't fit Wikipedia's Manual of style for subheadings and layout. In addition, only 3 references are used in the entire article - not bad for a start class article, but may not relay all aspects of the subject required for a GA. In other words, add more info! Ciar 23:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)