Talk:Isidore van Kinsbergen/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * b (MoS):
 * Lead could be longer
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * The whole artcile relies on three sources, can no more be found?
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will pass this but improvements could be made. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will pass this but improvements could be made. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will pass this but improvements could be made. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will pass this but improvements could be made. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)