Talk:Iskandar-i Shaykhi/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 23:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

This looks a very interesting article. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 23:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Criteria
The six good article criteria:
 * Well written
 * the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
 * it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout etc.


 * Verifiable
 * it contains a list of all references, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
 * all inline citations are from reliable sources;
 * it contains no original research; and
 * it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.


 * Broad in its coverage
 * it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
 * it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.


 * Neutral
 * it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.


 * Stable
 * it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.


 * Illustrated
 * images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
 * images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Review
This is a well-written article with 95.4% written by a single user (HistoryofIran). The article is stable, broad in coverage and structured with clear paragraphs and subsections.
 * Text in the last paragraph is identical to text in Kayumarth I. One is a copy or there is a remarkable coincidence. Please correct.
 * Sorry, but is that really important? Its written by me anyways. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * As long as you, the author of the first instance, think it is OK, I am happy to agree. simongraham (talk) 01:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The image of Timur is marked as superseded by a PNG file.
 * Yes, but that image is more blurry/worse quality. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * OK. Seems a good reason to keep the old one. simongraham (talk) 01:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The map is taken from a 2007 book. Please confirm the copyright status for the image.
 * Sorry, I don't understand. The basemap is from DEMIS and is public domain. I just edited it. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * My misunderstanding. That is OK. simongraham (talk) 01:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Is Amul related to Amol? If so, please link.
 * It is already linked. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was unclear. I mean the mention in "Chalabis or Chalavis, after a district in Amul". Is this something different? simongraham (talk) 01:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Not sure I understand. You mean the Amul mentioned in that sentence? No, that's the same Amul as the others. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


 * "latters family" should be "latter's family". This sentence is complex and could do with rewording to make it easier to read.
 * Reworded, thoughts? --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


 * It is unclear who "he" is in "He was well-received by the Baduspanid ruler". Consider rewording.
 * Done, whatdya think? --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Is there a reason for the brackets around fatwa? I feel that they are unnecessary and break the flow.
 * Ops, removed the brackets. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Based on the dates earlier in the article, "murdered Hasan I on 17 April 1349" should be Hasan II.
 * Fixed. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Is there an article on Ghiyath al-Din II? If so, there should be a link. If not, consider red linking.
 * There's not, and done. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The Yavari reference has no page numbers. I suggest finding the reference in the printed volume if possible as this would be consistent with the other references.
 * There were no page numbers in the source, just text. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Please ping me when you have made the changes. simongraham (talk) 01:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Great work, HistoryofIran. Thank you for your work on this article, and your diligence in the history of the region. That is a Good Article. simongraham (talk) 11:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)