Talk:Islamic criminal jurisprudence

I edited out the "rebellion against ruler" because the Islam specifically states that rebelling against an oppressive ruler is an acceptable course of action.

Edited Cynical rantings
This page is about islamic law it is not a page about criticism their are others for that, so stating "Some Muslims claim that there are very definite criteria that need to be met" and then going on to declare your own ignorance of a topic ..."What exactly would those "very definite criteria" is not made clear, and maybe what's definite here isn't that much definite over there." is not enriching this page but degrading it. If i have time ill expand more on Hudud punishment and its criteria which is very clear in Islamic books of Law, the person who wrote that passage all he had to do was open one up and do some reading and he would have found his answers. This one deals specifically with this issue. Ibn kathir (talk) 02:36, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Sharia courts

 * Strictly speaking, Islamic law does not have a distinct corpus of "criminal law," as sharia courts do not have prosecutors, and all matters, even criminal ones, are in principle handled as disputes between individuals

This has a ref, but it's misleading. Islamic courts have judges, and there are prisons and whippings. How is this "disputes between individuals"? --Uncle Ed (talk) 04:03, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Beheading in Islamic criminal jurisprudence
@Al-Andalusi: Please explain your revert here. Why are both the peer reviewed scholarly publications from journals "questionable sources"? RLoutfy (talk) 04:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)