Talk:Islamic criminal law in Aceh/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SnowFire (talk · contribs) 03:23, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Well, since apparently nobody wants to review this article, I guess I'll take it since it's an interesting topic and it would be silly to wait until 2018... nice work. One side question though: is apostasy a crime in Aceh? It certainly is in places like Egypt or Saudi Arabia, and it seems like a logical question people would want to know, since it seems like someone can get out of the Islamic courts if they renounce Islam and the offense is covered under secular law (unlike the poor alcohol seller).
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Two nits: It is not always entirely obvious which foreign phrases are in romanized Arabic, and which are in Indonesian. Maybe add more of the lang / lang-ar / lang-in templates in some of these places?  Secondly, the footnote about mononyms doesn't seem too relevant to THIS article.  Maybe more appropriate for Hamdani's article himself, if one is ever made, even a stubby one.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * This referenced article seems to indicate that basically everything in Qanun No. 4/2014 isn't in the civil code anyway (except rape?), rendering that article 5 provision moot - the tone of the Post article certainly makes it sound like all these restrictions apply to non-Muslims in Aceh.  Might be worth removing / clarifying that bit in the Wikipedia article.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Nice work finding sources on this.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All the images look actually freely licensed, rather than merely claiming to be.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * SnowFire (talk) 03:25, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * SnowFire (talk) 03:25, 30 November 2017 (UTC)