Talk:Isotopes of bohrium/Archive 1

Data 2003
This article is part of Wikiproject Isotopes. Please keep style and phrasings consistent across the set of pages. For later reference and improved reliability, data from all considered multiple sources is collected here. References are denoted by these letters:
 * (A) G. Audi, O. Bersillon, J. Blachot, A.H. Wapstra. The Nubase2003 evaluation of nuclear and decay properties, Nuc. Phys. A 729, pp. 3-128 (2003). &mdash; Where this source indicates a speculative value, the # mark is also applied to values with weak assignment arguments from other sources, if grouped together. An asterisk after the A means that a comment of some importance may be available in the original.
 * (B) National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, information extracted from the NuDat 2.1 database. (Retrieved Sept. 2005, from the code of the popup boxes).
 * (C) David R. Lide (ed.), Norman E. Holden in CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 85th Edition, online version. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida (2005). Section 11, Table of the Isotopes. &mdash; The CRC uses rounded numbers with implied uncertainties, where this concurs with the range of another source it is treated as exactly equal in this comparison.
 * (D) More specific level data from reference B's Levels and Gammas database.
 * (E) Same as B but excitation energy replaced with that from D.

Z  N refs symbol   half-life                   spin              excitation energy 107 153 AB |Bh-260  |0.3# ms                    | 107 154 A  |Bh-261  |13(4) ms                   | 107 154 B  |Bh-261  |12(+5-3) ms                | 107 154 C  |Bh-261  |12. ms                    | 107 155 A  |Bh-262  |290(160) ms                | 107 155 B  |Bh-262  |8.0(21) ms                 | 107 155 C  |Bh-262  |0.10 s                     | 107 155 A  |Bh-262m |14(4) ms                   |                 |300(60) keV 107 155 D  |Bh-262m |102(26) ms                 |                 |0+X keV 107 155 D  |Bh-262m |8.0(21) ms                 |                 |0+Y keV 107 155 C  |Bh-262m |8. ms                     | 107 156 A  |Bh-263  |200# ms                    | 107 156 B  |Bh-263  |0.2# ms                    | 107 157 A  |Bh-264  |1.3(5) s                   | 107 157 B  |Bh-264  |0.44(+60-16) s             | 107 157 C  |Bh-264  |0.44 s                     | 107 158 A  |Bh-265  |500# ms                    | 107 158 B  |Bh-265  |0.9(+7-3) s                | 107 159 A  |Bh-266  |5(3) s                     | 107 159 B  |Bh-266  |1.7(+82-8) ms              | 107 159 C  |Bh-266  |~1 s                       | 107 160 A  |Bh-267  |22(10) s                   | 107 160 B  |Bh-267  |17(+14-6) s                | 107 160 C  |Bh-267  |~17 s                      | 107 161 A  |Bh-268  |25# s                      | 107 162 A  |Bh-269  |25# s                      | 107 163 A  |Bh-270  |30# s                      | 107 164 AB |Bh-271  |40# s                      | 107 165 A  |Bh-272  |2# min                     | 107 165 B  |Bh-272  |10(+12-4) s                | 107 166 AB |Bh-273  |90# min                    | 107 167 AB |Bh-274  |90# min                    | 107 168 AB |Bh-275  |40# min                    |

Femto 11:53, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Isotopes of bohrium
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Isotopes of bohrium's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "93TWG": From Bohrium:  From Isotopes of hassium:  From Isotopes of rutherfordium: "DISCOVERY OF THE TRANSFERMIUM ELEMENTS", IUPAC/IUPAP Technical Report, ''Pure & Appl. Chem.'', Vol. 65, No. 8, pp. 1757-1814,1993. Retrieved on 2008-03-04 

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:46, 15 September 2013 (UTC)