Talk:Isotopes of seaborgium

comment
The half lives for Sg-269 and Sg-271 are not similar on the first page compared with the list of isotopes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.103.68.65 (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC) ="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.103.68.65 (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Isotopes of seaborgium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225154203/http://www.gsi.de/informationen/wti/library/scientificreport2006/PAPERS/NUSTAR-SHE-05.pdf to http://www.gsi.de/informationen/wti/library/scientificreport2006/PAPERS/NUSTAR-SHE-05.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Beta stability of 268Sg
Given the mass shown in the table, it seems very likely that 268Sg is beta-stable! Of course, we need to reduce the uncertainties of the mass measurements to a quarter of what they are now to conclude. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 00:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)