Talk:Isotopes of silver

93Ag
The table lists no decay mode or daughter nuclei for 93Ag. Surely it must turn into something? --Pciszek (talk) 03:28, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of silver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Added decay modes and daughter nuclei for 93Ag, need better cite
I added the decay modes and daughter nuclei of 93Ag from https://periodictable.com/Isotopes/047.93/index.dm.html; I do not know where Theodore Gray got them from. If anyone can come up with a better cite, please cite accordingly, and maybe add some probabilities for each mode. Pciszek (talk) 15:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Ag-108m
The listing for Ag-108m in the comprehensive chart is wrong. It doesn't decay by positron emission. The information given in the main isotope chart is correct, correlating with info given in a table published by the Laboratoire Nationale Henri Becquerel 168.149.195.146 (talk) 18:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)