Talk:Israel–Syria Mixed Armistice Commission

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Israel–Syria Mixed Armistice Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726121056/http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/E845CA0B92BE4E3485256442007901CC to http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/E845CA0B92BE4E3485256442007901CC

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Helpful Source
Hello fellow wikipedians,

I cannot edit this page as I have not made the required 500 edits.

However I have found a source that will be helpful for this line stated, '30 October 1956, when Israel attacks Egypt across the Sinai peninsula in co-ordination with an Anglo-French attack on Suez, the remainder of the Palestinians living in the DMZs are driven into Syria.[citation needed] '

The book is part of the International and comparative law series called A Guide to Documents on the Arab-Palestinian/Israeli Conﬂict: 1897–2008 http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com.ezproxy1.library.usyd.edu.au/content/books/9789047428787 On pages 25-28 one can find a detailed account of the Suez war and its effects on the Palestinian people.

Manon1998 (talk) 08:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 * You gave a university-specific URL. A direct URL is here but there is a paywall. Zerotalk 09:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Missing: abolished after 67, or de jure still ghosting around?
After the 6-Day War, new DMZ agreements were signed in accordance to the new reality on the ground. Has the old DMZ been officially abolished, or does it still ghost around? N.b.: it was always seen as a mode of regulating a de facto situation! "Not precluding..." was the formula. So the 49 DMZ has no real raison d'etre anymore, but bureaucracy and reality can be parallel entities.

PS: The lead, i.e. the definition, uses the past tense ("was"), but forgets to point out in which time period the DMZ regulation was in force. Was it 49-67? I guess so, but is it?Arminden (talk) 15:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)