Talk:Israeli apartheid/Sandbox

I think the best way forward, and to see whether the article can be unblocked because people are conscious enough not to edit war and to discuss changes, I have created a sandbox version Israeli apartheid/Sandbox. I suggest people edit this according to WP:NPOV, WP:ISNOT, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, and come up with a better version. Good does not equate to longer, writing concise is a skill in itself and improves the quality of an article dramatically as it is easier to read for people and they get faster to the main content. I am curious. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 16:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Discussion
Zeq, I am curious about why you changed this: Critics of the term argue that it is historically inaccurate, offensive, antisemitic, and is used as justification for terrorist attacks against Israel. to this: Critics of the term argue that it is inaccurate.? Would you mind to give you reasoning for this? -- Kim van der Linde at venus 17:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Those claim are not accurate so i removed them. no proof that using this term promotes terrorism. Zeq 16:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

On the "Criticism" section, given all points come from only two sources, and their sources don't actually list them, does a list format here seem appropriate? Also, it's original research to have the article itself seem as if it's making these points; it's better to have things phrased 'according to so-and-so, the term israeli aparthied...". His Excellency... 17:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)